Instruction (AFI) _IP, Management Of Aviation Critical Safety Items; Air Force Policy. Directive , AFMC Quality Assurance; and. Find the most up-to-date version of AFI at Engineering Additionally, this AF Instruction (AFI) implements the policies in management is contained in AFI , Air Force Acquisition Quality.
|Published (Last):||22 March 2017|
|PDF File Size:||12.54 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.69 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Ensure that relevant stakeholders are involved early in the acquisition planning processes 635-01 explicitly identifying organizational responsibility for support and enhancements.
Although the details of how this is Version September 12 Version September accomplished are determined at the Center level or Wing level in the absence of a Centerit is intended that the validation assessment be a collaborative effort between the project personnel and the validation assessment team.
The second context is the logical analysis that discovers any natural partitioning manifested in the requirements. Describe all production-related activities that must be accomplished to ensure a smooth transition from development to rate production. Develop, ai and document validation criteria, methods and procedures.
When actual status deviates significantly from expected values, corrective actions are taken, as appropriate.
Do you enjoy reading reports from the Academies online for free? Self Assessment Phase – B. Develop procedures and guidelines for evaluating and ati qualified manufacturers. Maintain all required certifications. The division of responsibilities between the acquirer and suppliers is determined for each project.
Looking for other ways to read this?
There is a continuous iteration developing increasingly detailed derived requirements as the multiple layers of a complex product are defined. Define tasks in the WBS for the work of the project to include activities performed by the acquirer as well as the suppliers and other stakeholders to ensure the planning effort covers the full scope.
Validation Determination – C If not already directed to do so, at this time leadership will determine if an independent validation is required. Document the team membership, its leaders, resources and other constraints. Establish a threshold for risk acceptance. Describe the approach to integrating systems engineering with overall project management efforts e.
Plan for involvement of stakeholders from other projects 63-510 communities to ensure the delivered product can perform as required in its intended environment when it has to interoperate with other products. As early as possible in development, proof of manufacturing models should be used to establish that planned production processes and procedures are compatible with the design. Monitor and analyze progress against technical, cost, and schedule plans immediately after they are established and throughout the life cycle.
DG1P4 Develop potential product-component solutions, alternatives, and selection criteria Description: The Decision Analysis process area can best be described by the following goals and practices. Assessment team members should leave this meeting with a clear understanding of the effort before them, their individual role and responsibilities, the resources available, and the schedule.
Establish and maintain initial and life-cycle resources requirements for performing operations and support. Verify that interfaces conform to established standards, agreements and specifications, and lower level designs are consistent with top-level designs.
Specify how measurement data will be obtained, stored, updated and presented. Subsequent directives from the Secretary of the Air Force and the Air Force chief of staff gave very specific instructions for upgrading and managing the acquisition workforce.
Summary Page 10 Share Cite. Consider performing periodic integrated risk assessments. The second primary use of AF SEAM is the capture of process improvement ideas and lessons learned in an area that will be immediately visible to those needing this information. The responsibility for developing requirements down through the levels is generally split between the acquirer and the suppliers.
Version September 77 Version September 9. Practices fall into two categories: The processes and associated practices address acquirer activities as well as activities conducted by the integrator or supplier and other organizations throughout the supply-chain. At the same time, leaders in the Services continue to face aggressive performance, cost, and schedule baselines. Assign responsibility using detailed job descriptions or project documents.
Change existing cost, schedule, and performance baselines to accommodate the requirements change.
Requirements Specification Section 4 Reference Material: Consider the full collection of contracts within a project context so that an integrated approach results, rather than dealing with activities individually. Develop entry and exit criteria for each project milestone or key decision points. Consider supportability risks in hardware, software and firmware. Attention to storage and retrieval procedures helps ensure that data are available and accessible for future use.
Search the history of over billion web pages on the Internet. For some requirements, review of previous requirements for validity and accuracy may comprise much of the effort.
They should be selected based on their contribution to meeting project objectives and requirements, and to addressing project risks. Define requirements for support equipment, facilities and facility modifications. Document commitments to ensure a consistent mutual understanding, as well as for tracking and maintenance.
TO D 01SEP USAF DEFICIENCY REPORTING
Pay particular attention to external factors which could influence a product acquisition and sustainment over which the team may have little control.
Document program, technology, and manufacturing risks in a ari statement that includes the sources, context, conditions and consequences of risk occurrence. This provides a basis for acquisition process discipline, while balancing the need for flexibility, and tailoring to specific AF user needs.
Evaluate and recommend optimal acquisition type e. Develop verification methods as requirements are accepted into the baseline.